Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 6:24:52 GMT -5
Let no one be thought badly. The title is not an epithet. It refers to a royal vessel, twice, as it exists in reality and has a retired king as its owner. Why should we clarify it? In any amphibology, one sense or another predominates depending on the pragmatic context and this is where the problem would lie. What is the reason why there may be room for misunderstandings? We are not talking about an individual who travels to see his family after a stay abroad. This is proven by an impressive deployment of security paid for by taxpayers who comply with their fiscal responsibilities, something that some avoid by keeping their assets secret. This could have been amassed thanks to the position he held for four decades and, if so, it would have a special treachery. However, if any irregularity came to light, it would almost be worse, because we would make an inventory of crimes that went unpunished due to an incomprehensible absolute immunity while he was carrying out his duties as Head of State. Let's put ourselves in their place. Would we resist the temptation to amass a fortune knowing that we would never be prosecuted for anything? It is much calmer to be an ordinary citizen held accountable by the law.
Immunity does not exactly promote containment. The fact is that he has come to sail with his friends and seeking the applause of the locals with computer coverage that makes it impossible not to notice his presence among us. That would make a lot of sense if you were interested in promoting a referendum to choose between constitutional monarchism or reverting our constitution Australia Phone Number to the republican model that overthrew a military uprising supported by Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy. But it is not plausible that she intends to leave her youngest daughter and her designated successor unemployed. Be that as it may, truly picturesque arguments slip into his defense. During his represented trips to Spain, the Emeritus would have collected some 62,000 million euros and there is no evidence that he set aside a small commission of such a huge sum, which on the other hand is not very clear on what documentary sources he relies on. Where did the 65 million donated or lent to one of his lovers who is now prosecuting him in London come from ? Unsolved mystery. It is assumed that he had it. Are there other deposits entrusted to his friends? Nobody knows for now. Let's leave speculation aside and turn to objective data.
What did Juan Carlos de Borbón do to be Juan Carlos I and appear in the 1978 Constitution? Being the grandson of a king, although the line of succession did not predict it. His father was banned by a Dictator who designated his son as his political heir to whitewash his regime and allow the monarchy to be restored only after his death. One can always refuse to receive certain orders. What gaps exist in the file of the case against the King Emeritus? Let's say that, aware of his historical role, he decided to take on Franco's job to restore democracy and promote a complicated political transition. Not supporting a new military uprising to impose a concentration government would deserve eternal gratitude. But there were many other protagonists of that fateful day of 23 F and the Transition who also emerged there. We are told that he enunciated his all-powerful powers to return his sovereignty to the people. What would have happened if it had not been done that way? Under this hypothesis, the imagination can travel through very strange twists and turns. There are many reflections that his trip inspires us. It is endearing to see a venerable old man sailing on his Rascal and wanting to see those close to him. But it is a disservice to a Royal House that is trying to give another image, once the pact of silence that existed for a long time regarding the family was broken.
Immunity does not exactly promote containment. The fact is that he has come to sail with his friends and seeking the applause of the locals with computer coverage that makes it impossible not to notice his presence among us. That would make a lot of sense if you were interested in promoting a referendum to choose between constitutional monarchism or reverting our constitution Australia Phone Number to the republican model that overthrew a military uprising supported by Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy. But it is not plausible that she intends to leave her youngest daughter and her designated successor unemployed. Be that as it may, truly picturesque arguments slip into his defense. During his represented trips to Spain, the Emeritus would have collected some 62,000 million euros and there is no evidence that he set aside a small commission of such a huge sum, which on the other hand is not very clear on what documentary sources he relies on. Where did the 65 million donated or lent to one of his lovers who is now prosecuting him in London come from ? Unsolved mystery. It is assumed that he had it. Are there other deposits entrusted to his friends? Nobody knows for now. Let's leave speculation aside and turn to objective data.
What did Juan Carlos de Borbón do to be Juan Carlos I and appear in the 1978 Constitution? Being the grandson of a king, although the line of succession did not predict it. His father was banned by a Dictator who designated his son as his political heir to whitewash his regime and allow the monarchy to be restored only after his death. One can always refuse to receive certain orders. What gaps exist in the file of the case against the King Emeritus? Let's say that, aware of his historical role, he decided to take on Franco's job to restore democracy and promote a complicated political transition. Not supporting a new military uprising to impose a concentration government would deserve eternal gratitude. But there were many other protagonists of that fateful day of 23 F and the Transition who also emerged there. We are told that he enunciated his all-powerful powers to return his sovereignty to the people. What would have happened if it had not been done that way? Under this hypothesis, the imagination can travel through very strange twists and turns. There are many reflections that his trip inspires us. It is endearing to see a venerable old man sailing on his Rascal and wanting to see those close to him. But it is a disservice to a Royal House that is trying to give another image, once the pact of silence that existed for a long time regarding the family was broken.