Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:11:24 GMT -5
Vanguardia, November The PP demands that the Government process the law to depoliticize the CGPJ” (El Mundo, November 8, 2021). “There will only be an agreement for the CGPJ if there is a law to depoliticize it” (El Mundo, November 8, 2021). These are some examples from the conservative press, examples that only counter El País and some digital ones (for example, Juan Fernando López Aguilar: “ THE CGPJ before the EU and the reputation of Spain”, El País, November 9,). As Figes says, so much insistence ends up permeating public opinion. However, the content of this great right-wing campaign rests on several fallacies, namely, a “politicized”, “partisan” CGPJ, in need of regeneration, not in accordance with European canons. Let's look at these myths: The CGPJ is politicized. Of course it is and it would be the same if only the Judges and Magistrates participated in its election. The governing body of the Judiciary, regardless of the way its members are selected, will always be politicized, because governing.
And if these arguments were not enough, the Constitution requires the election of a minimum of eight Members for the Congress and the Senate. Isn't the obligatory parliamentary election going to be politicized? On the other hand, the conservative press and the political Australia Phone Number and judicial right use the adjective “political” with a negative bias, as was done during the dictatorship when politics is the most dignified function of any society, because it aspires to govern it. The CGPJ is “partisan.” If Deputies and Senators participate in the election, it is impossible for political parties not to be interested in the result of the election. But, in the first place, it is not a disdain either, because the parties “express political pluralism, contribute to the formation and manifestation of the popular will and are a fundamental instrument for political participation” (article 6 of the Constitution). If the parties are entrusted with these noble functions, why are we scandalized, as Franco would do? Furthermore, if, as we have pointed out above, the judicial associations (which are quasi-unions.
play in this place The parliamentary election of all its Members does not respond to European canons. This is another lie. The founding Treaties say nothing and cannot say anything. It is true that ideas about the self-election of the members of this type of judicial government bodies slip into the Commission's reports and so does a working group of the Council of Europe (GRECO, Group of States against Corruption), which A Croatian deputy, Marin Mrcela, presides. But it turns out that in most European States and in the United States the Judiciary is not governed by any Council, so the opinions of the European Commission and the Council of Europe are an excess that do not correspond to the principles of Law. community. But these fallacies are piercing public opinion, because it would be necessary for the left-wing parties to give them a more forceful and, above all, more persistent response. Finally, another fallacy that is already beginning to circulate. In June 2022, the Government and the CGPJ must each propose two Magistrates of the Constitutional.
And if these arguments were not enough, the Constitution requires the election of a minimum of eight Members for the Congress and the Senate. Isn't the obligatory parliamentary election going to be politicized? On the other hand, the conservative press and the political Australia Phone Number and judicial right use the adjective “political” with a negative bias, as was done during the dictatorship when politics is the most dignified function of any society, because it aspires to govern it. The CGPJ is “partisan.” If Deputies and Senators participate in the election, it is impossible for political parties not to be interested in the result of the election. But, in the first place, it is not a disdain either, because the parties “express political pluralism, contribute to the formation and manifestation of the popular will and are a fundamental instrument for political participation” (article 6 of the Constitution). If the parties are entrusted with these noble functions, why are we scandalized, as Franco would do? Furthermore, if, as we have pointed out above, the judicial associations (which are quasi-unions.
play in this place The parliamentary election of all its Members does not respond to European canons. This is another lie. The founding Treaties say nothing and cannot say anything. It is true that ideas about the self-election of the members of this type of judicial government bodies slip into the Commission's reports and so does a working group of the Council of Europe (GRECO, Group of States against Corruption), which A Croatian deputy, Marin Mrcela, presides. But it turns out that in most European States and in the United States the Judiciary is not governed by any Council, so the opinions of the European Commission and the Council of Europe are an excess that do not correspond to the principles of Law. community. But these fallacies are piercing public opinion, because it would be necessary for the left-wing parties to give them a more forceful and, above all, more persistent response. Finally, another fallacy that is already beginning to circulate. In June 2022, the Government and the CGPJ must each propose two Magistrates of the Constitutional.