Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 5:31:16 GMT -5
The lawyer for the family of Deportivo fan Francisco Javier Romero 'Jimmy', who died in a brawl with Frente Atlético ultras in November 2014, considers "implausible" the decision of the Court of Instruction number 20 of Madrid to close the case without blame. summary instruction.
The aforementioned Court has considered that there is no evidence of criminality against any person, according to the order, which is why it agrees to "declare this summary concluded without prosecution" which will be sent to the Provincial Court of Madrid to rule on whether to file this procedure.
The lawyer for Jimmy's family, Erlantz Ibarrondo, has Binance App Users Data said in statements to Efe that he received the news with "shocker" because "there is a witness who is not part" of the Deportivo fans "who says the name and surname of the people" who allegedly killed Jimmy on November 30, 2014.
He added that the fact that "this is not sufficient evidence to go to trial and for it to become evidence is implausible."
"The investigating judge has to determine whether there are indications or not. There are two indications, the witness and the identification made by the police. With these indications, the instructor's only option is to open a trial and then the judge will have to determine if these indications are evidence or not," he noted.
He has considered that "depriving the family of a trial with a testimony from a person who says who the murderers are with names and surnames is very difficult to understand."
The lawyer has confirmed that he filed a motion for annulment before the Madrid Court in charge of the case, because his request for the three people identified by the witness as alleged perpetrators of Jimmy's death to testify was not granted.
That request from the prosecution was rejected, according to the lawyer, the day before the order was issued with which the judge decided to close the summary.
"We have been left without evidence that was very important to us, which was testified by the people who were identified by the witness. The summary has been closed without giving the accusing parties the opportunity to ask them," he lamented.
"It is a bit devastating; we are fighting alone against all odds," the lawyer said.
The judge's decision is not appealable and the Madrid Court must now determine if its decision to close the case is correct or if it requests further action, the lawyer explained.
It may interest you
The aforementioned Court has considered that there is no evidence of criminality against any person, according to the order, which is why it agrees to "declare this summary concluded without prosecution" which will be sent to the Provincial Court of Madrid to rule on whether to file this procedure.
The lawyer for Jimmy's family, Erlantz Ibarrondo, has Binance App Users Data said in statements to Efe that he received the news with "shocker" because "there is a witness who is not part" of the Deportivo fans "who says the name and surname of the people" who allegedly killed Jimmy on November 30, 2014.
He added that the fact that "this is not sufficient evidence to go to trial and for it to become evidence is implausible."
"The investigating judge has to determine whether there are indications or not. There are two indications, the witness and the identification made by the police. With these indications, the instructor's only option is to open a trial and then the judge will have to determine if these indications are evidence or not," he noted.
He has considered that "depriving the family of a trial with a testimony from a person who says who the murderers are with names and surnames is very difficult to understand."
The lawyer has confirmed that he filed a motion for annulment before the Madrid Court in charge of the case, because his request for the three people identified by the witness as alleged perpetrators of Jimmy's death to testify was not granted.
That request from the prosecution was rejected, according to the lawyer, the day before the order was issued with which the judge decided to close the summary.
"We have been left without evidence that was very important to us, which was testified by the people who were identified by the witness. The summary has been closed without giving the accusing parties the opportunity to ask them," he lamented.
"It is a bit devastating; we are fighting alone against all odds," the lawyer said.
The judge's decision is not appealable and the Madrid Court must now determine if its decision to close the case is correct or if it requests further action, the lawyer explained.
It may interest you